All LPWAN players in one short overview

 Originally published on March 17, 2021 by Patrick Gebhardt
Last updated on January 23, 2024 • 8 minute read

LoRa, Sigfox, MIOTY, and NB IoT (or LTE-M), so many names, so many LPWAN players, so many ways of connecting devices fast, reliably, and cost-effectively. There's an increasing demand for connecting simple devices such as sensors and actuators with as little energy consumption and the greatest coverage possible. Although LPWAN (low-power wide-area networking) is just one of several transmission technologies in the IoT (Internet of things) field, it is becoming increasingly important, for the private and the commercial sector, like industrial processes (IIoT), fully connected buildings (building state monitoring), and projects in the context of Smart City, Smart Agriculture, and Environmental monitoring. Specific requirements for building state monitoring that go beyond LPWAN will be covered in a separate blog article soon.

iLPWA stands for low-power and wide-area. It does not refer to any one specific technology, but rather serves as a generic term for any network designed to communicate wirelessly with lower power than other networks such as cellular, satellite, or WiFi. Moreover, LPWANs communicate over greater distances than other low-power networks that use Bluetooth or NFC, for example. Read more ...

What are the differences between LoRA, Sigfox, MIOTY, NB IoT and LTE-M?

Those differences can be partly subtle but crucial for the success of different industries and applications. In the following, we will present the most well-known and largest standards to date. We've updated the list recently but is surely needs to be amended in the future because IoT is a growing market where things are nowhere near set in stone.


LoRa is a technology that was acquired by chip manufacturer Semtech in 2012. It offers relatively good bandwidth compared to other LPWAN technologies but requires the use of Semtech chips. LoRa has gained momentum in the European market, and today there are a series of applications. The network infrastructure itself for LoRa must be built, as is also the case with MIOTY - and unlike Sigfox. This means that LoRa and MIOTY are only of interest for projects that have a spatial boundary; anything else would have extremely high additional costs due to infrastructure and staff. On the other hand, this method avoids network standard dependencies, which is the case when using the Sigfox network.


This technology from French company Sigfox is best suited for applications with extremely low bandwidth and highly constrained energy budgets; thus, the transmitters are self-contained and do not rely on a power supply. Examples include container tracking, concepts such as the “smart trash can” or tracking suitcases. The special thing about Sigfox is that it is a completely standalone network for IoT devices. Currently, the infrastructure is fully functional in 73 countries, connecting more than 5.7 billion people. It is an open standard that operates on sub-GHz frequencies (between 868 and 928 MHz) and can be used by any wireless carrier.


The MIOTY software solution from the Fraunhofer Institute uses an efficient channel encoding scheme that increases its range by a factor of 10 compared to conventional 868-MHz wireless systems. Since it creates little self-interference, the system can simultaneously support up to a million transmitters. Whereas, e.g. Sigfox sends complete data packets, MIOTY splits them into sub-packets (called telegram splitting). Transmitters are based on conventional chips from manufacturers such as Silabs or Chipcon, and they stand out due to their compact design and extended battery operation of up to several decades. The receivers, which are equipped with digital signal processors, are characterized by a flexible design that allows them to be tailored to specific customer applications; they can be used for both stationary and mobile applications and can be optimized for both environments.

NB IoT (and LTE-M)

The requirements for NB IoT were only defined at the beginning of 2016. This new narrowband radio technology (which isn't outdated in light of 5G) offers a suitable LTE category for low-bandwidth IoT devices. It uses the existing infrastructure of LTE and GSM carriers to make low-bandwidth communication easier for IoT devices. LTE-M is part of release 13 of the 3GPP standards to lower power consumption, reduce the cost of devices, and to allow for greater coverage in order to reach challenging areas (such as deep inside buildings). This standard will improve the bandwidth of NB IoT. Furthermore, it offers what is perhaps the highest level of security out of all the LPWAN technologies presented here.

The diagram of LPWAN technologies

Picturing the differences between the aforementioned technologies by distinguishing between “open standard” – “vendor-specific” and “public” – “private” produces the following diagram, which also makes specific applications more understandable.


It's clear to see: The best LPWAN technology that is suitable for all purposes and industries does not exist. LoRa, Sigfox, MIOTY, and NB IoT each have different applications where they can demonstrate their strengths.

Building state monitoring

Next, you can look forward to an article series about the protocols, gateways, and data transmission methods relevant in building state monitoring. Soon on our blog!